ASP.Net Core Areas

Question

hello in the below code i have two areas and am using conventional routing in MVC my my qustion do i always should add the name of the the area to the pattern as below

Tuhin Paul · Answer

You don't have to add the area name to the pattern in your conventional routing. it's often a good idea to do so especially for clarity and consistency. When you look at the route pattern it's immediately clear which area the route belongs to. This makes it easier to understand and debug your application. If all your routes have the area name in the pattern it provides a consistent approach making your code easier to maintain. If you have routes with the same names in different areas adding the area name to the pattern ensures that there are no naming conflicts. 1. Including Area Name in the Pattern: app.MapAreaControllerRoute( name: blog areaName: Blog pattern: blog/{controller}/{action}/{id?} ); Pros: Clearer consistent prevents potential conflicts. Cons: Slightly more verbose. 2. Not Including Area Name in the Pattern: app.MapAreaControllerRoute( name: blog areaName: Blog pattern: {controller}/{action}/{id?} ); Pros: Less verbose. Cons: Less clear about the route's area potential conflicts if similar routes exist in other areas.

mina shaker · Answer

@Tuhin Paul but when i did it like below code as you can see the pattern is the same no area spacifaied this where the conflicts come into place correct? app.MapAreaControllerRoute( name : blog areaName : Blog pattern : {controller}/{action}/{id?} ); app.MapAreaControllerRoute( name: Zebra areaName: Zebra pattern: {controller}/{action}/{id?} );