C# Architecture Best Practices
Design robust and scalable C# applications by following these architecture best practices.
Use Dependency Injection
Important
Implement dependency injection to create loosely coupled, testable code.
Recommended Approach
// Good
public class OrderService
{
private readonly IPaymentProcessor _paymentProcessor;
private readonly IEmailService _emailService;
public OrderService(IPaymentProcessor paymentProcessor, IEmailService emailService)
{
_paymentProcessor = paymentProcessor;
_emailService = emailService;
}
}
Avoid This Approach
// Bad
public class OrderService
{
private readonly PaymentProcessor _paymentProcessor = new PaymentProcessor();
private readonly EmailService _emailService = new EmailService();
}
Implement Microservices Architecture
Critical
Design your application as a collection of loosely coupled services to improve scalability and maintainability.
Recommended Approach
// Good
public class OrderService
{
public void ProcessOrder(Order order)
{
// Logic to process order
}
}
// Microservice setup
public class OrderMicroservice
{
private readonly OrderService _orderService;
public OrderMicroservice(OrderService orderService)
{
_orderService = orderService;
}
public void Start()
{
// Start microservice
}
}
Avoid This Approach
// Bad
public class MonolithicOrderProcessor
{
public void ProcessOrder(Order order)
{
// Logic to process order
// All logic in one place
}
}
Use Event-Driven Architecture
Important
Implement event-driven architecture to decouple components and improve responsiveness.
Recommended Approach
// Good
public class EventPublisher
{
public void PublishEvent(Event event)
{
// Logic to publish event
}
}
public class EventSubscriber
{
public void Subscribe()
{
// Logic to subscribe to events
}
}
Avoid This Approach
// Bad
public class TightlyCoupledComponent
{
public void Execute()
{
// Direct calls to other components
}
}
Implement Domain-Driven Design (DDD)
Critical
Use DDD to align your software model with business needs and improve communication between technical and non-technical stakeholders.
Recommended Approach
// Good
public class CustomerAggregate
{
public void AddOrder(Order order)
{
// Logic to add order to customer
}
}
Avoid This Approach
// Bad
public class Customer
{
public void AddOrder(Order order)
{
// Logic scattered across multiple classes
}
}
Adopt a Layered Architecture
Important
Structure your application into layers (e.g., presentation, business, data) to separate concerns and improve maintainability.
Recommended Approach
// Good
public class PresentationLayer
{
public void DisplayData()
{
// Logic to display data
}
}
public class BusinessLayer
{
public void ProcessData()
{
// Logic to process data
}
}
Avoid This Approach
// Bad
public class MonolithicApplication
{
public void Execute()
{
// All logic in one place
}
}
Implement CQRS (Command Query Responsibility Segregation)
Important
Separate the read and write operations of your application to optimize performance and scalability.
Recommended Approach
// Good
public class CommandHandler
{
public void HandleCommand(Command command)
{
// Logic to handle command
}
}
public class QueryHandler
{
public TResult HandleQuery<TResult>(Query query)
{
// Logic to handle query
return default(TResult);
}
}
Avoid This Approach
// Bad
public class UnifiedHandler
{
public void HandleRequest(Request request)
{
// Mixed logic for handling commands and queries
}
}
Use API Gateway Pattern
Critical
Implement an API Gateway to manage and route requests to various microservices, providing a single entry point.
Recommended Approach
// Good
public class ApiGateway
{
public void RouteRequest(Request request)
{
// Logic to route request to appropriate microservice
}
}
Avoid This Approach
// Bad
public class DirectClientAccess
{
public void AccessService(Service service)
{
// Direct access to microservices without a gateway
}
}
Adopt Semantic Versioning
Important
Use semantic versioning (MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH) to communicate changes in your API or software effectively.
Recommended Approach
// Good
// Version 1.0.0 - Initial release
// Version 1.1.0 - Added new features
// Version 2.0.0 - Breaking changes introduced
Avoid This Approach
// Bad
// Version 1 - Initial release
// Version 2 - Added new features and breaking changes
Version Your APIs
Critical
Ensure your APIs are versioned to manage changes and maintain backward compatibility.
Recommended Approach
// Good
// API v1
[Route("api/v1/products")]
public IActionResult GetProductsV1()
{
// Logic for version 1
}
// API v2
[Route("api/v2/products")]
public IActionResult GetProductsV2()
{
// Logic for version 2
}
Avoid This Approach
// Bad
// No versioning
[Route("api/products")]
public IActionResult GetProducts()
{
// Logic without versioning
}
Document Version Changes
Important
Maintain a changelog to document changes, bug fixes, and updates for each version.
Recommended Approach
// Good
// Changelog
// Version 1.0.0 - Initial release
// Version 1.1.0 - Added feature X
// Version 1.1.1 - Fixed bug Y
Avoid This Approach
// Bad
// No changelog
// Users are unaware of changes and updates
Deprecate Old Versions Gracefully
Critical
Provide clear deprecation notices and timelines for phasing out old versions.
Recommended Approach
// Good
// Deprecation notice
// API v1 will be deprecated on 2023-12-31
// Please migrate to API v2
Avoid This Approach
// Bad
// No deprecation notice
// Users are caught off guard by sudden changes
Implement Feature Toggles
Important
Use feature toggles to manage the release of new features without deploying a new version.
Recommended Approach
// Good
public class FeatureToggle
{
public bool IsFeatureXEnabled { get; set; }
public void ToggleFeatureX()
{
// Logic to enable/disable feature X
}
}
Avoid This Approach
// Bad
// No feature toggles
// New features require a full deployment
Use Version Control Branching Strategies
Critical
Adopt branching strategies like Git Flow or trunk-based development to manage version control effectively.
Recommended Approach
// Good
// Git Flow
// - master: production-ready code
// - develop: latest development changes
// - feature branches: new features
Avoid This Approach
// Bad
// No branching strategy
// Code changes are made directly to the main branch